MB-700 · Question #48
Case Study 1 - City Power and Light Background City Power and Light is a publicly traded electric utility company. The company has a corporate office, four regional field offices, two subsidiary compa
The correct answer is A. Use security roles with segregation of duties.. For a publicly traded utility company, financial integrity requires that no single user can perform end-to-end sensitive transactions (e.g., create a vendor AND approve payments). Segregation of Duties (SoD) in Dynamics 365 Finance enforces this by defining conflicting duty pairs
Question
Options
- AUse security roles with segregation of duties.
- BImplement a security group for all users in finance department.
- CUse security roles with audit workbench.
- DGrant multiple security roles per user.
How the community answered
(41 responses)- A76% (31)
- B15% (6)
- C5% (2)
- D5% (2)
Explanation
For a publicly traded utility company, financial integrity requires that no single user can perform end-to-end sensitive transactions (e.g., create a vendor AND approve payments). Segregation of Duties (SoD) in Dynamics 365 Finance enforces this by defining conflicting duty pairs - if a user is assigned roles that include both duties, the system flags or blocks the assignment. Using security roles with SoD (A) is the correct approach to prevent unauthorized or fraudulent financial transactions. A blanket security group for all finance users (B) does not restrict conflicts. Audit Workbench (C) is a reporting/review tool, not a preventive control. Granting multiple roles per user (D) without SoD checking could worsen the problem by combining conflicting permissions.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.