nerdexam
Juniper

JN0-696 · Question #19

[edit security utm] user@host# show custom-objects { url-pattern { blocklist { } acceptlist { } } custom-url-category { blacklist { value blocklist; } whitelist { value acceptlist; } } }…

The correct answer is C. You must use integrated or redirect Web filtering instead of local list filtering. A, D: These are options for content filtering as opposed to web filtering. B: Fallback is for error conditions.

Troubleshooting Policy

Question

[edit security utm] user@host# show custom-objects { url-pattern { blocklist { } acceptlist { } } custom-url-category { blacklist { value blocklist; } whitelist { value acceptlist; } } } feature-profile { web-filtering { url-whitelist whitelist; url-blacklist blacklist; type juniper-local; juniper-local { profile web-filter { custom-block-message "Site is not allowed"; fallback-settings { default log-and-permit; } } } } } utm-policy utm1 { web-filtering { http-profile web-filter; } } You set up Web filtering to allow employees to only access your internal website. You notice that employees are still able to reach websites outside of the blacklists. Which parameter must be changed?

Options

  • AYou must define all sites you want to block using the mime-pattern parameter.
  • BYou must change the fallback-settings parameter to default block.
  • CYou must use integrated or redirect Web filtering instead of local list filtering.
  • DYou must define all sites you want to block using the protocol-command parameter.

How the community answered

(61 responses)
  • A
    8% (5)
  • B
    3% (2)
  • C
    70% (43)
  • D
    18% (11)

Explanation

A, D: These are options for content filtering as opposed to web filtering. B: Fallback is for error conditions.

Topics

#UTM web filtering#local list limitation#fallback settings#integrated web filtering

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full JN0-696 Practice