JN0-694 Exam Questions
55 real JN0-694 exam questions with expert-verified answers and explanations. Page 1 of 2.
- Question #1
An end user on interface ge-0/0/1.0 is trying to receive a multicast stream for 232.0.0.1 sourced from but is not receiving it. You use the show igmp group command and do not see t...
- Question #2
You are asked to configure a multihop EBGP peering to a loopback address of your ISP. The peering does not establish, and the ISP has verified that the settings are correct on thei...
- Question #3
Referring to the exhibit, what is causing the IPv4 BGP peering to stay in an active state? user@router# run show log bgp-test ... Jun 10 23:50:43.056697 BGP SEND 192.168.133.1+179...
- Question #4
You are troubleshooting a problem where an EBGP route is not being advertised to your local IBGP peers. You have received a 10.222.1.3/32 route from an EBGP peer as shown in the ex...
- Question #5
The exhibit shows a small switched network, some details about the MSTP configuration in the network, and the VLANs that are trunked over each link. When Switch2 reboots, users in...
- Question #6
You are troubleshooting a problem where external routes are not being summarized into the OSPF backbone. Referring to the exhibit, what needs to be done to resolve this problem?
- Question #7
You are asked to troubleshoot an access control issue on your EX Series switch. The user connecting through port ge-0/0/1 indicates that their 802.1X supplicant is failing authenti...
- Question #8
Referring to the exhibit, an administrator has configured dot1q-tunneling on the VLAN, but LLDP is not being tunneled. What is causing the problem?
- Question #9
You are asked to troubleshoot a problem with MSTP and determine why Switch-1 and Switch-2 think they are the root bridge for the same MSTI instances. Switch-1 should be the root br...
- Question #10
Interface ge-0/0/12 on Switch1 is connected to ge-0/0/12 on Switch2. You have configured both Switch1 and Switch2 to run MSTP. You see the CLI output shown in the exhibit. What wou...
- Question #11
Referring to the exhibit, an administrator notices that the VLAN interface is not coming up. What would cause this problem? Click the Exhibit to see a larger version.
- Question #12
You have configured OSPF between two routers and the adjacency is not coming up. You confirm that the physical link between them is up and then run the commands shown in the exhibi...
- Question #13
Referring to the exhibit, the prefix 3.3.3.3/32 is not in R1 's routing table. Which two configuration changes on R2 would resolve the problem? (Choose two.)
- Question #14
The exhibit shows the BGP configuration for a router. The router should be receiving an identical set of prefixes over its two peering sessions. You want to ensure the router is us...
- Question #15
You want to receive routes from a remote EBGP peer as shown in the exhibit. The remote site has the same AS number as your own. You have successfully established the EBGP peering,...
- Question #16
You are configuring an IBGP peer between R1 and R2. The BGP neighbor cannot be established. Referring to the exhibit, which configuration change will resolve this problem?
- Question #17
You are asked to troubleshoot the new IBGP peering session shown in the exhibit between R1 and R2. Which action will resolve the problem?
- Question #18
You are implementing Q-in-Q tunneling on an EX Series switch. You want the tunnel to support all C- VLANs; however, only some VLANs are able to send traffic across the tunnel. Swit...
- Question #19
You are troubleshooting a problem where an OSPF adjacency between two neighboring routers will not form. What are two reasons for this problem? (Choose two.)
- Question #20
Your Junos device is dropping certain traffic flows, while allowing other traffic flows to pass through the device unaffected. Which CoS component is causing this problem?
- Question #21
Two neighboring routers are able to form an OSPF adjacency, but are not able to establish an IBGP neighborship. What are two reasons for the IBGP neighborship problem? (Choose two....
- Question #22
Your switch is experiencing a problem where a port that should have only one host connected occasionally shows that multiple MAC addresses are being learned. Which configuration se...
- Question #23
You are having problems redistributing RIP routes into OSPF. Your Junos device has the following configuration: [edit protocols ospf] user@router# show import my-policy; area 0.0.0...
- Question #24
You observe that a router is using an unusually high amount of CPU cycles. You determine that continuous SPF calculations in OSPF are being performed. What are two reasons for this...
- Question #25
Your Layer 2 network uses VLAN IDs 100 through 400 and you are required to load-balance these VLANs between two different root bridges. You are currently using the default RSTP set...
- Question #26
You have been asked to troubleshoot a problem where a user is not able to send traffic through your switch. {master:0}[edit ethernet-switching-options secure-access-port] user@swit...
- Question #27
Referring to the exhibit, an administrator notices that all traffic is flooded out of all the ports in VLAN ws. user@switch# show vlans ws { vlan-id 23; interface { ge-0/0/12.0; ge...
- Question #28
Traffic with the IPP value af21 should be assigned to the expedited forwarding queue; however, this traffic is not being assigned to that queue. user@router# show class-of-service...
- Question #29
Traffic with the IP precedence value af21 ingresses the router and should be rewritten with the same value as it egresses; however, this traffic is rewritten to a different value....
- Question #30
You are sending traffic to the ge-0/0/0 interface on R1 with the expedited forwarding (101) IP precedence bits. However, the counters on the router show that it is not processing a...
- Question #31
The exhibit shows part of the configuration for a router. You receive a complaint that the router is not correctly reclassifying all traffic to the best-effort forwarding class whe...
- Question #32
There is a lot of traffic marked with IP precedence values af2l and af3l that ingresses the router. The af3l traffic should be using the expedited forwarding queue, but the traffic...
- Question #33
You add a multicast source to a network. The source's DR sends register messages to the RP However, multicast clients are not able to receive traffic from the source. What are two...
- Question #34
You are monitoring a network that is configured with PIM sparse mode. An end user's PC (PC1) joins a multicast stream. The stream never switches from the rendezvous-point tree (RPT...
- Question #35
You recently deployed two Anycast RPs. Multicast clients in the network are reporting that they are receiving traffic from some, but not all, multicast sources. What are two soluti...
- Question #36
You use static routes for connectivity to the ISP. Your ISP recently switched to using different links for multicast and unicast traffic. Following the change, users in your compan...
- Question #37
Referring to the exhibit, what is preventing the OSPF neighborship with two directly connected routers using interface ge-1/0/3 from reaching the full state? user@router# run show...
- Question #38
Referring to the exhibit, why are the OSPF routes missing from the routing table for this router? user@router> show ospf database Area 0.0.0.1 Type ID Adv Rtr Seq Age Opt Cksum Len...
- Question #39
Referring to the exhibit, you are configuring an OSPF network. All OSPF adjacencies come up and stay stable. But neither R1 nor R2 has the prefix 200.200.200.200/32 in its routing...
- Question #40
You are troubleshooting an OSPF adjacency problem between R1 and R2. Referring to the exhibit, what is causing this OSPF adjacency problem?
- Question #41
You notice that there is a problem with the OSPF adjacency between two routers, R1 and R2. The relevant system logs from R1 are shown in the exhibit. Jun 12 02:56:06 R1 rpd[60735]:...
- Question #42
You are trying to establish an OSPF adjacency between R1 and R2, but the adjacency does not establish. user@R1> show ospf neighbor Address Interface State ID Pri Dead 10.222.0.2 ge...
- Question #43
Referring to the exhibit, an administrator is trying to advertise a direct route to its neighbor. The route is not advertised. What is causing this behavior?
- Question #44
A customer reports that BGP graceful restart is not working on R1. After a Routing Engine failover, R1 did not set the restart state bit in its Open message. The customer provides...
- Question #45
You are asked to assist with a problem with a new EBGP peering between Site 1 and Site 2. Referring to the exhibit, Site 1 is not receiving the 100.100.0.0/16 routes from Site 2. W...
- Question #46
On R1, the interface fe-0/0/1 is assigned to the default routing instance and fe-0/0/2 is assigned to a virtual router instance named VR-1. Referring to the exhibit, the static rou...
- Question #47
A network engineer wants to leak routes between routing instances vr1 and vr2. No routes from vr2 are showing up in vr1. [edit routing-instances] user@router# show vr1 routing-opti...
- Question #48
The exhibit shows the complete BGP configuration for a router. The network operator reports that both peering sessions are up, but the router is not conducting per-flow load balanc...
- Question #49
The policy shown in the exhibit is deployed on a router and used as the only BGP export policy. The router is sending only one BGP route to its peers. However, when you run the CLI...
- Question #50
Given test route 192.168.1.0/24 and the configuration shown in the exhibit, what is the expected result? policy-statement test_route_filter { term 1 { from { route-filter 192.168.0...