JN0-683 · Question #6
Your organization is implementing EVPN-VXLAN and requires multiple overlapping VLAN-IDs. You decide to use a routing-instance type mac-vrf to satisfy this request. Which two statements are correct…
The correct answer is A. Host-facing interfaces must be configured using a service-provider style configuration. D. The routing-instance service type can be VLAN-based. Host-facing interfaces must be configured using a service-provider style configuration When using MAC-VRF routing instances to support overlapping VLAN IDs, host-facing interfaces need service-provider style (unit with VLAN tagging inside a logical interface). This allows the…
Question
Your organization is implementing EVPN-VXLAN and requires multiple overlapping VLAN-IDs. You decide to use a routing-instance type mac-vrf to satisfy this request. Which two statements are correct in this scenario? (Choose two.)
Options
- AHost-facing interfaces must be configured using a service-provider style configuration.
- BHost-facing interfaces must be configured using enterprise-style configuration.
- CSpine-facing interfaces must be configured using an enterprise-style configuration.
- DThe routing-instance service type can be VLAN-based.
How the community answered
(42 responses)- A79% (33)
- B12% (5)
- C10% (4)
Explanation
Host-facing interfaces must be configured using a service-provider style configuration When using MAC-VRF routing instances to support overlapping VLAN IDs, host-facing interfaces need service-provider style (unit with VLAN tagging inside a logical interface). This allows the same VLAN ID to exist in multiple VRFs without conflict. The routing-instance service type can be VLAN-based MAC-VRF instances can be VLAN-based, which maps a VLAN to the routing instance for L2
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.