nerdexam
Juniper

JN0-664 · Question #45

Referring to the exhibit, the 10.0.0.0/24 EBGP route is received on R5; however, the route is being hidden. What are two solutions that will solve this problem? (Choose two.)

The correct answer is B. On R4, create a policy to change the BGP next hop to itself and apply it to IBGP as an export policy. D. On R4, add the external EBGP interface's prefix to the IGP routing tables. You've hit your limit · resets 4am (America/New_York)

Advanced BGP Routing for Service Providers

Question

Referring to the exhibit, the 10.0.0.0/24 EBGP route is received on R5; however, the route is being hidden. What are two solutions that will solve this problem? (Choose two.)

Options

  • AOn R4, create a policy to change the BGP next hop to 172.16.1.1 and apply it to IBGP as an export policy.
  • BOn R4, create a policy to change the BGP next hop to itself and apply it to IBGP as an export policy.
  • COn R4, add the internal IBGP interface prefixes to the BGP routing tables.
  • DOn R4, add the external EBGP interface's prefix to the IGP routing tables.

How the community answered

(32 responses)
  • A
    22% (7)
  • B
    66% (21)
  • C
    13% (4)

Explanation

You've hit your limit · resets 4am (America/New_York)

Topics

#BGP next-hop#IBGP#hidden routes#next-hop-self

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full JN0-664 Practice