Juniper
JN0-661 · Question #99
In the exhibit, R2 is receiving external routing information for the 192.168.16.0/24 prefix and is redistributing it into IS-IS. R1 has a policy that leaks the 192.168.16.0/24 route into Area…
The correct answer is A. The Up/Down bit is set to down for the prefix. See the full explanation below for the reasoning.
Question
In the exhibit, R2 is receiving external routing information for the 192.168.16.0/24 prefix and is redistributing it into IS-IS. R1 has a policy that leaks the 192.168.16.0/24 route into Area 49.1111. R3 has a policy that leaks the 192.168.16.0/24 route into Area 49.2222. However, the IS-IS version of the route does not appear in R2's routing table. Why does R3's route leaking policy appear not to be working?
Exhibit
Options
- AThe Up/Down bit is set to down for the prefix.
- BThe external flag is set for the prefix.
- CYou can only leak routes from Level 2 to Level 1.
- DR2 already has better routing information for the prefix.
How the community answered
(36 responses)- A72% (26)
- B8% (3)
- C3% (1)
- D17% (6)
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.
