nerdexam
Juniper

JN0-661 · Question #99

In the exhibit, R2 is receiving external routing information for the 192.168.16.0/24 prefix and is redistributing it into IS-IS. R1 has a policy that leaks the 192.168.16.0/24 route into Area…

The correct answer is A. The Up/Down bit is set to down for the prefix. See the full explanation below for the reasoning.

Question

In the exhibit, R2 is receiving external routing information for the 192.168.16.0/24 prefix and is redistributing it into IS-IS. R1 has a policy that leaks the 192.168.16.0/24 route into Area 49.1111. R3 has a policy that leaks the 192.168.16.0/24 route into Area 49.2222. However, the IS-IS version of the route does not appear in R2's routing table. Why does R3's route leaking policy appear not to be working?

Exhibit

JN0-661 question #99 exhibit

Options

  • AThe Up/Down bit is set to down for the prefix.
  • BThe external flag is set for the prefix.
  • CYou can only leak routes from Level 2 to Level 1.
  • DR2 already has better routing information for the prefix.

How the community answered

(36 responses)
  • A
    72% (26)
  • B
    8% (3)
  • C
    3% (1)
  • D
    17% (6)

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full JN0-661 Practice