nerdexam
Juniper

JN0-637 · Question #41

You have configured a CoS-based VPN that is not functioning correctly. Referring to the exhibit, which action will solve the problem?

The correct answer is D. You must delete one forwarding class. The issue in the CoS (Class of Service) configuration as shown in the exhibit lies in the number of forwarding classes mapped to DSCP code points. In Junos OS, the DSCP BA (Behavior Aggregate) classifier can only map up to six forwarding classes per classifier. Referring to the…

Site-to-Site and Remote Access VPNs

Question

You have configured a CoS-based VPN that is not functioning correctly. Referring to the exhibit, which action will solve the problem?

Exhibit

JN0-637 question #41 exhibit

Options

  • AYou must change the loss priorities of the forwarding classes to low.
  • BYou must change the code point for the DB-data forwarding class to 10000.
  • CYou must use inet precedence instead of DSCP.
  • DYou must delete one forwarding class.

How the community answered

(33 responses)
  • A
    12% (4)
  • B
    9% (3)
  • C
    3% (1)
  • D
    76% (25)

Explanation

The issue in the CoS (Class of Service) configuration as shown in the exhibit lies in the number of forwarding classes mapped to DSCP code points. In Junos OS, the DSCP BA (Behavior Aggregate) classifier can only map up to six forwarding classes per classifier. Referring to the exhibit: There are seven forwarding classes: (and one implied by the error - possibly a misconfigured or additional one) Therefore, the correct solution is: You must delete one forwarding class. This action will bring the configuration within the limit of six forwarding classes per DSCP BA classifier, resolving the CoS-based VPN issue.

Topics

#CoS-based VPN#forwarding classes#DSCP#loss priority

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full JN0-637 Practice