nerdexam
Juniper

JN0-637 · Question #113

You have configured a CoS-based VPN that is not functioning correctly. Referring to the exhibit, which action will solve the problem?

The correct answer is A. You must delete one forwarding class. In the exhibit, the CoS-based VPN configuration is not functioning correctly due to an issue with the number of forwarding classes. The maximum number of forwarding classes supported for CoS-based VPNs with multiple SAs (security associations) is typically four forwarding…

Site-to-Site and Remote Access VPNs

Question

You have configured a CoS-based VPN that is not functioning correctly. Referring to the exhibit, which action will solve the problem?

Exhibit

JN0-637 question #113 exhibit

Options

  • AYou must delete one forwarding class.
  • BYou must change the loss priorities of the forwarding classes to low.
  • CYou must use inet precedence instead of DSCP.
  • DYou must change the code point for the DB-data forwarding class to 10000.

How the community answered

(24 responses)
  • A
    58% (14)
  • B
    25% (6)
  • C
    13% (3)
  • D
    4% (1)

Explanation

In the exhibit, the CoS-based VPN configuration is not functioning correctly due to an issue with the number of forwarding classes. The maximum number of forwarding classes supported for CoS-based VPNs with multiple SAs (security associations) is typically four forwarding classes. In this case, more than four forwarding classes are defined. To solve the issue, one forwarding class must be deleted to ensure that the total number of forwarding classes is reduced to four or fewer.

Topics

#CoS-based VPN#forwarding class#DSCP#IPsec

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full JN0-637 Practice