JN0-481 · Question #24
You are creating a template using Juniper Apstra. In this scenario, what is a rack-based design compared to a pod-based design?
The correct answer is B. A rack-based design refers to a three-stage Clos, and a pod design refers to a five-stage Clos. In Juniper Apstra: A rack-based design typically maps to a three-stage Clos topology, where racks are the unit of scale and directly connect to spine devices. A pod-based design corresponds to a five-stage Clos topology, where multiple racks are grouped into pods, and the…
Question
You are creating a template using Juniper Apstra. In this scenario, what is a rack-based design compared to a pod-based design?
Options
- AA rack-based design allows the operator to select a specified number of downlinked servers,
- BA rack-based design refers to a three-stage Clos, and a pod design refers to a five-stage Clos.
- CA rack-based design is suitable for physical servers, whereas a pod-based design is used for
- DA rack-based design connects local servers only, whereas a pod-based design can include virtual
How the community answered
(19 responses)- A5% (1)
- B95% (18)
Explanation
In Juniper Apstra: A rack-based design typically maps to a three-stage Clos topology, where racks are the unit of scale and directly connect to spine devices. A pod-based design corresponds to a five-stage Clos topology, where multiple racks are grouped into pods, and the fabric scales further using additional layers (e.g., super spines).
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.