JN0-363 · Question #34
Referring to the exhibit, internal BGP between R1 and R2 is not establishing. What is the problem In this scenario?
The correct answer is A. R1 does not have a route to 192.168.200.2. The exhibit shows that the BGP session state is "Active," which generally indicates that the router is trying to establish a BGP session but has not received a response. One common cause for this issue is that there is no route to the BGP neighbor's address. Since the routers…
Question
Referring to the exhibit, internal BGP between R1 and R2 is not establishing. What is the problem In this scenario?
Exhibit
Options
- AR1 does not have a route to 192.168.200.2.
- BR1 and R2 must each have unique AS numbers.
- CR1 needs to be configured with an explicit router ID.
- DR1 needs to be configured with a next-hop self policy.
How the community answered
(23 responses)- A78% (18)
- B13% (3)
- C4% (1)
- D4% (1)
Explanation
The exhibit shows that the BGP session state is "Active," which generally indicates that the router is trying to establish a BGP session but has not received a response. One common cause for this issue is that there is no route to the BGP neighbor's address. Since the routers are using internal BGP (iBGP) and they are in the same AS, the AS number does not need to be unique, and a next-hop self policy is not strictly required for iBGP. The router-id is usually automatically determined and does not need to be explicitly set.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.