JN0-343 · Question #342
Click the Exhibit button. user@router> show configuration | no-more ... interfaces { ge-0/0/0 { unit 0 { family inet { address 10.210.12.131/27; } } } ge-0/0/1 { unit 0 { family inet { filter {…
The correct answer is D. The software is not able to resolve the next hop of the default route in the fbf routing instance. See the full explanation below for the reasoning.
Question
Click the Exhibit button. user@router> show configuration | no-more ... interfaces { ge-0/0/0 { unit 0 { family inet { address 10.210.12.131/27; } } } ge-0/0/1 { unit 0 { family inet { filter { input fbf; } address 10.210.14.1/24; } } } } firewall { filter fbf { term 1 { then { routing-instance fbf; } } } } routing-instances { fbf { instance-type forwarding; routing-options { static { route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 10.210.12.129; } } } } user@router> show route inet.0: 4 destinations, 4 routes (4 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both 10.210.12.128/27 *[Direct/0] 3d 23:21:02 > via ge-0/0/0.0 10.210.12.131/32 *[Local/0] 3d 23:21:17 Local via ge-0/0/0.0 10.210.14.0/24 *[Direct/0] 00:00:07 > via ge-0/0/1.0 10.210.14.1/32 *[Local/0] 00:00:07 Local via ge-0/0/1.0 What is causing the behavior shown in the exhibit?
Options
- AThe software is ignoring the fbf routing instance because it uses a reserved name.
- BThe software is ignoring the default route in the fbf routing instance because there is no default route
- CThe software is not able to find an interface on the router configured with the 10.210.12.129 address.
- DThe software is not able to resolve the next hop of the default route in the fbf routing instance.
How the community answered
(49 responses)- A2% (1)
- B8% (4)
- C4% (2)
- D86% (42)
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.