Juniper
JN0-333 · Question #44
Click the Exhibit button. You are setting up a chassis cluster with two SRX240 devices with node0 as primary and node1 as secondary. You notice each node shows the other node as lost. user@host>…
The correct answer is D. You must have the same cluster ID for node0 and node1. See the full explanation below for the reasoning.
Question
Click the Exhibit button. You are setting up a chassis cluster with two SRX240 devices with node0 as primary and node1 as secondary. You notice each node shows the other node as lost.
user@host> show chassis cluster status
Cluster ID: 2
Nodes Priority Status Preempt Manual failover
Redundancy group: 0 , Failover count: 0
node0 0 lost n/a n/a
node1 100 secondary no no
Redundancy group: 1 , Failover count: 0
node0 0 lost n/a n/a
node1 0 secondary yes no
{secondary:node1}[edit]
user@host# show chassis
cluster {
reth-count 2;
redundancy-group 0 {
node 0 priority 200;
node 1 priority 100;
}
redundancy-group 1 {
node 0 priority 200;
node 1 priority 100;
preempt;
interface-monitor {
ge-0/0/4 weight 255;
}
}
}
Referring to the exhibit, which statement is correct?
Options
- AYou must have redundancy-group 0 applied to a redundant interface for node0 and node1.
- BYou must add preempt to the redundancy-group 0 configuration for node0 and node1.
- CYou must remove the disable configuration from interface ge-0/0/4 for node0 and node1.
- DYou must have the same cluster ID for node0 and node1.
How the community answered
(39 responses)- A8% (3)
- B15% (6)
- C5% (2)
- D72% (28)
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.