Juniper
JN0-332 · Question #166
Which statement is true for interfaces residing outside of redundancy groups?
The correct answer is D. Interfaces that are not in a redundancy group can still forward traffic, but no redundancy is available for them. See the full explanation below for the reasoning.
Question
Which statement is true for interfaces residing outside of redundancy groups?
Options
- AThe interfaces cannot be mapped to security zones.
- BOnly interfaces that have redundancy can be active in the chassis cluster.
- CAll interfaces will be redundant if they reside on a system that is part of a chassis cluster.
- DInterfaces that are not in a redundancy group can still forward traffic, but no redundancy is available for them.
How the community answered
(31 responses)- A3% (1)
- B13% (4)
- C6% (2)
- D77% (24)
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.