Juniper
JN0-1300 · Question #15
A customer is using a Clos IP fabric design in their data center. What is the advantage of using EBGP signaling between spine and leaf nodes rather than IBGP in this scenario?
The correct answer is D. EBGP does not require support for the ADD-PATH capability. Explanation/Reference: By default, EBGP meets all of the implementation requirements when you build the IP fabric. There's no need for BGP route reflection or BGP Add Path with EBGP
Routing Fundamentals
Question
A customer is using a Clos IP fabric design in their data center. What is the advantage of using EBGP signaling between spine and leaf nodes rather than IBGP in this scenario?
Options
- AAn EBGP router automatically performs the next hop self-operation on advertised routes.
- BBy default, EBGP supports multihop sessions between peers.
- CA leaf node can have multiple EBGP sessions with a spine node.
- DEBGP does not require support for the ADD-PATH capability.
How the community answered
(18 responses)- A11% (2)
- C6% (1)
- D83% (15)
Explanation
Explanation/Reference: By default, EBGP meets all of the implementation requirements when you build the IP fabric. There's no need for BGP route reflection or BGP Add Path with EBGP
Topics
#EBGP#ADD-PATH#Clos fabric#route signaling
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.