JN0-1103 · Question #28
What two statements are true about SD-WAN? (Choose two.)
The correct answer is B. SD-WAN branches can aggregate different WAN circuits. D. SD-WAN supports local breakout for Direct Internet Access. B is correct because SD-WAN is specifically designed to aggregate multiple WAN circuits (MPLS, broadband, LTE, etc.) at a branch, load-balancing or failing over across them intelligently. D is correct because SD-WAN enables local internet breakout (Direct Internet Access)…
Question
What two statements are true about SD-WAN? (Choose two.)
Options
- ADistributed policy enforcement does not scale.
- BSD-WAN branches can aggregate different WAN circuits.
- CSD-WAN routers must have specialized hardware to do application routing.
- DSD-WAN supports local breakout for Direct Internet Access
How the community answered
(53 responses)- A21% (11)
- B70% (37)
- C9% (5)
Explanation
B is correct because SD-WAN is specifically designed to aggregate multiple WAN circuits (MPLS, broadband, LTE, etc.) at a branch, load-balancing or failing over across them intelligently. D is correct because SD-WAN enables local internet breakout (Direct Internet Access), allowing branch traffic to exit directly to the internet rather than being backhauled through a data center - a key design goal of SD-WAN.
A is wrong because distributed policy enforcement is actually a strength of SD-WAN; policies are pushed centrally and enforced at each edge device, which scales well across many branches. C is wrong because SD-WAN deliberately runs on commodity or virtual hardware - no specialized ASICs are required; application-aware routing is handled in software, which is a core SD-WAN value proposition.
Memory tip: Think of SD-WAN's two superpowers as "Aggregate and Escape" - it aggregates multiple WAN links (B) and lets traffic escape locally to the internet (D). If an answer suggests SD-WAN requires special hardware or doesn't scale, it's describing the legacy architecture SD-WAN was built to replace.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.