inet.0: 4 destinations, 4 routes (4 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, = Both 172.23.10.0/24 [Direct/0] 21:59:56 >via ge-0/0/6.0 172.23.10.100/32 [Local/0] 22:00:10 Local

Configuring a separate routing instance would isolate routing information and is not a suitable action for simply adding a missing route to the primary routing table (`inet.0`).

Configuring a default static route (`0.0.0.0/0`) would ensure that any traffic destined for subnets not explicitly in the routing table, including `172.23.14.0/24`, is forwarded to a specified next-hop, providing a catch-all solution.

The most direct solution is to configure a specific static route for `172.23.14.0/24` with the correct next-hop address, explicitly informing the router how to forward traffic to that particular subnet.

The existing static routes already have resolved indirect next-hops, and modifying them would not help in routing traffic to the currently unreachable `172.23.14.0/24` subnet.