user@router> show route inet.0: 9 destinations, 9 routes (9 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, = Both 10.10.10.91/32 [Direct/0] 00:09:40 >via lo0.0 10.10.10.92/32…

user@router> show route inet.0: 9 destinations, 9 routes (9 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both 10.10.10.91/32 *[Direct/0] 00:09:40 >via lo0.0 10.10.10.92/32 *[OSPF/10] 00:01:50, metric 1 >to 172.16.1.2 via ge-0/0/2.0 100.100.1.0/24 *[Static/5] 00:01:50 Reject 172.16.1.0/24 *[Direct/0] 00:06:09 >via ge-0/0/2.0 172.16.1.1/32 *[Local/0] 00:06:09 Local via ge-0/0/2.0 192.168.0.0/16 *[Aggregate/130] 00:00:06 Reject 192.168.0.0/17 *[Aggregate/130] 00:00:06 >to 172.16.1.2 via ge-0/0/2.0 192.168.50.0/24 *[Static/5] 00:00:06 >to 172.16.1.2 via ge-0/0/2.0 192.168.51.0/24 *[Static/5] 00:00:06 >to 172.16.1.2 via ge-0/0/2.0 user@router> show configuration policy-options policy-statement demo { term 1 { from { route-filter 192.168.0.0/16 longer accept; } then reject; } } user@router> show configuration protocols ospf export demo; area 0.0.0.0 { interface ge-0/0/2.0; } Given the configuration and routing table shown in the exhibit, which routes will be advertised to OSPF neighbors because of the demo policy?