ISO-IEC-42001-LEAD-AUDITOR · Question #69
While preparing for an AIMS audit, a technology company faced an issue: the auditor lacked a required security clearance for accessing sensitive information related to government contracts. The…
The correct answer is A. Yes, the auditor not holding the security clearance required by the auditee is a valid reason to. It is acceptable for an auditee to request a change if the assigned auditor lacks necessary security clearances to perform the audit properly. ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 5.2.2 requires that auditors must have appropriate competence, including security requirements, for…
Question
While preparing for an AIMS audit, a technology company faced an issue: the auditor lacked a required security clearance for accessing sensitive information related to government contracts. The company requested a replacement auditor. Is this acceptable?
Options
- AYes, the auditor not holding the security clearance required by the auditee is a valid reason to
- BNo, the auditee can request the replacement of the auditor only if the auditor is in a conflict of
- CNo, the auditee can request the replacement of the auditor only if the auditor has audited the
How the community answered
(28 responses)- A71% (20)
- B18% (5)
- C11% (3)
Explanation
It is acceptable for an auditee to request a change if the assigned auditor lacks necessary security clearances to perform the audit properly. ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 5.2.2 requires that auditors must have appropriate competence, including security requirements, for sensitive audits. The Lead Auditor Training specifies: "Auditee organizations have the right to request a replacement of auditors if competence (including security clearance) is insufficient for audit scope
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.