ISO-IEC-42001-LEAD-AUDITOR · Question #176
Did the audit team leader thoroughly review all essential components before deciding to close the nonconformity? Refer to scenario 9. Scenario 9: ImoAl, headquartered in California. USA, provides Al…
The correct answer is A. Yes, the audit team leader reviewed all the necessary elements. The scenario indicates that the audit team leader thoroughly evaluated ImoAI's corrective actions, root cause analysis, and effectiveness of those actions before closing the nonconformity. This aligns with ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.8, which states that verification must…
Question
Did the audit team leader thoroughly review all essential components before deciding to close the nonconformity? Refer to scenario 9. Scenario 9: ImoAl, headquartered in California. USA, provides Al solutions for various industries such as finance, healthcare, retail, and manufacturing. Its clients include major financial institutions seeking Al powered fraud detection systems, healthcare providers leveraging Al for diagnostics and patient care, retailers optimizing supply chain management with Al forecasting, and manufacturers enhancing production efficiency through Al- driven automation. ImoAl has recently undergone a certification audit to ensure that its artificial intelligence management system AIMS is in compliance with ISO/IEC 42001. During the audit, a major nonconformity related to data security protocols was identified, requiring urgent resolution. ImoAl swiftly initiated corrective actions to address the major nonconformity. The audit follow-up, in agreement with the auditee, was scheduled six weeks after the initial audit. As part of exploring alternatives to audit follow-up, the audit team leader chose to verify the effectiveness of the actions taken by the auditee by scheduling a specific visit to ImoAI's premises. The follow-up audit involved a thorough evaluation of the effectiveness of these actions. The audit team leader thoroughly examined the corrections, corrective actions, and root cause analysis conducted by ImoAl to assess whether they adequately addressed the nonconformity identified during the initial audit. In conjunction with the external audit follow-up, ImoAl engaged its internal auditing team to oversee the progress of corrective actions. The AIMS manager of ImoAl updated Ms. Rebecca Hayes, the internal auditor, on the status of corrections and corrective actions prompted by the nonconformity identified during the external audit. Subsequently, Ms. Hayes thoroughly reviewed these measures, analyzing the corrections, root causes, and effectiveness of the implemented actions. Upon satisfactory validation of the action plans, ImoAl was recommended for certification.
Options
- AYes, the audit team leader reviewed all the necessary elements
- BNo, the audit team leader overlooked potential impacts on related processes
- CNo, the audit team leader focused solely on immediate corrective actions without considering long-
How the community answered
(38 responses)- A79% (30)
- B8% (3)
- C13% (5)
Explanation
The scenario indicates that the audit team leader thoroughly evaluated ImoAI's corrective actions, root cause analysis, and effectiveness of those actions before closing the nonconformity. This aligns with ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.8, which states that verification must include not only confirmation that the problem was fixed but also that the root cause has been addressed to prevent recurrence. The use of internal audits (as carried out by Ms. Hayes) further supports the thoroughness of the
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.