ISO-IEC-42001-LEAD-AUDITOR · Question #167
Were VeridicAI's action plans drafted appropriately? Refer to Scenario 8. Scenario 8: VeridicAI. based in San Francisco. USA, specializes in market research using Al technologies to analyze customer…
The correct answer is A. Yes, a general action plan must be submitted, addressing all nonconformities simultaneously. The scenario confirms that all the nonconformities identified were minor, and VeridicAI responded with a comprehensive (i.e., general) action plan covering all of them. According to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 10.2 and audit guidelines in ISO 19011:2018, it is acceptable and…
Question
Were VeridicAI's action plans drafted appropriately? Refer to Scenario 8. Scenario 8: VeridicAI. based in San Francisco. USA, specializes in market research using Al technologies to analyze customer behavior. Founded in 2023, the company employs natural language processing, machine learning, and predictive analytics to provide real time insights to a range of businesses. VeridicAI has implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMS based on ISO/IEC 42001 to manage its Al technologies effectively. The AIMS scope includes select departments within the company, for which it has received a four-year certification against ISO/IEC 42001. Committed to transparency. VeridicAI publicly shares details of this certification. As the certification nears its end, VeridicAI is preparing for an audit to renew its certification. The audit process was led by Sharona, the audit team leader, who is a full-time employee of the certification body. Sharona and the audit team undertook all planned audit activities. Afterward, they organized the closing meeting with VeridicAl's management. During the meeting, Sharona and the team made a recap on audit objectives and scope, presented the audit findings and conclusions, presented identified nonconformities, and organized a session for questions and answers for the auditee. VeridicAI received a conditional recommendation for certification, underscoring its compliance with the industry's standards. Sharona confirmed that the company met the essential requirements but noted some identified minor nonconformities. In response, VeridicAI compiled and submitted a comprehensive action plan that addresses all identified nonconformities within a designated timeframe. Because of the comprehensive action plan, Sharona did not see the need for an additional on-site visit to verify the effectiveness of the action plan. Sharona played an integral role in the certification decision process. Her thorough understanding of VeridicAI's operations, gained from the audit, guided the certification body towards a well- informed certification decision.
Options
- AYes, a general action plan must be submitted, addressing all nonconformities simultaneously
- BNo, a general action plan must be submitted for all the minor nonconformities, whereas for major
- CNo, an action plan must be submitted separately for each nonconformity
How the community answered
(42 responses)- A83% (35)
- B7% (3)
- C10% (4)
Explanation
The scenario confirms that all the nonconformities identified were minor, and VeridicAI responded with a comprehensive (i.e., general) action plan covering all of them. According to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 10.2 and audit guidelines in ISO 19011:2018, it is acceptable and often encouraged for the auditee to submit a consolidated corrective action plan for multiple minor nonconformities. Separate plans are generally only required for significant (major) nonconformities that impact the effectiveness of the management system.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.