IIA-CIA-PART2 · Question #148
Management testimony of improper segregation of duties in the cash receipt process can be considered which of the following?
The correct answer is C. Relevant. Management testimony of improper segregation of duties in the cash receipt process can be considered relevant. Relevant evidence directly relates to the matter being examined, which in this case is the proper segregation of duties in the cash receipt process. Testimony from…
Question
Management testimony of improper segregation of duties in the cash receipt process can be considered which of the following?
Options
- AAnalytical
- BReliable
- CRelevant
- DSufficient
How the community answered
(26 responses)- A4% (1)
- C92% (24)
- D4% (1)
Explanation
Management testimony of improper segregation of duties in the cash receipt process can be considered relevant. Relevant evidence directly relates to the matter being examined, which in this case is the proper segregation of duties in the cash receipt process. Testimony from management can provide insights and context that are pertinent to understanding and assessing this specific control issue.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.