All of the following are states a file cluster can exist in an Microsoft XP operating system except:

Question

Options

• AAllocated
• BUnallocated
• CInode cluster fragment
• DAllocated deleted

• A
  9% (3)
• B
  3% (1)
• C
  85% (29)
• D
  3% (1)

Explanation

Option C is correct because inodes are a Unix/Linux file system concept (used in ext2/ext3/ext4), not a Windows XP concept. Windows XP uses FAT32 or NTFS, neither of which uses inodes - so "inode cluster fragment" is simply not a valid cluster state in that operating system.

Why the distractors are wrong (they ARE valid Windows XP cluster states):

• A. Allocated - a cluster actively assigned to and used by a file.
• B. Unallocated - a cluster not assigned to any file; available free space.
• D. Allocated deleted - a cluster that was assigned to a file which has since been deleted; the space is marked free but data may still be recoverable (critical in digital forensics).

Memory tip: Think "Inodes = Linux, not Windows." If you see any inode-related terminology in a Windows XP question, that's your red flag - inodes belong to the Unix world. On Windows, cluster states revolve around allocation and deletion status only.

No community discussion yet for this question.