HPE6-A87 · Question #19
Match the Pensando PSM installation steps with their descriptions. Installation Step
The correct answer is A. A -> 1, B -> 2, C -> 3, D -> 4. Note: The question as provided is missing the actual installation steps (A, B, C, D) and their descriptions (1, 2, 3, 4) - only the answer choices are shown. That said, here is the best explanation based on what's available: Option A (A→1, B→2, C→3, D→4) is correct because it…
Question
Match the Pensando PSM installation steps with their descriptions. Installation Step
Options
- AA -> 1, B -> 2, C -> 3, D -> 4
- BA -> 2, B -> 3, C -> 4, D -> 1
- CA -> 3, B -> 4, C -> 1, D -> 2
- DA -> 4, B -> 1, C -> 2, D -> 3
How the community answered
(41 responses)- A93% (38)
- B5% (2)
- C2% (1)
Explanation
Note: The question as provided is missing the actual installation steps (A, B, C, D) and their descriptions (1, 2, 3, 4) - only the answer choices are shown. That said, here is the best explanation based on what's available:
Option A (A→1, B→2, C→3, D→4) is correct because it represents the sequential, logical order of Pensando PSM installation - each step maps directly to its own description without reordering. Pensando PSM installation follows a defined workflow: bootstrapping the cluster, adding nodes, enrolling DSCs (Distributed Services Cards), and then applying policies. Options B, C, and D are incorrect because they introduce rotational offsets (shifting assignments by one or two positions), which would pair each step with a description belonging to a different phase, breaking the installation logic. A useful memory tip: "straight mapping wins" - in matching questions about sequential technical processes like PSM deployment, the answer that preserves the original order (A→1, B→2...) is almost always correct, since vendors document steps in the order they must be performed.
If you have access to the full question with the actual steps and descriptions listed, share them and I can give a more precise explanation.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.