HPE6-A86 · Question #1
A network is configured with two 2930F switches as the aggregation layer. Each 2930F switch has ten connections. The network has twenty 2530 access switches connected to both aggregation switches…
The correct answer is A. Create VSF on the CX 6200 and a lag for CX 6200 and 2530. By forming a VSF stack with the two CX 6200 switches, they operate as a single logical switch. This allows each 2530 access switch to build one LACP LAG using two uplink ports -- one to each CX 6200 member -- while still being treated as a single aggregated connection…
Question
A network is configured with two 2930F switches as the aggregation layer. Each 2930F switch has ten connections. The network has twenty 2530 access switches connected to both aggregation switches with 1Gb RJ45. Your task is to replace the aggregation switches with CX 6200 models. In this scenario, which configuration would provide redundancy using two ports on the access switches to the aggregation layer?
Options
- ACreate VSF on the CX 6200 and a lag for CX 6200 and 2530.
- BCreate a single domain VSF for CX 6200 and 2530.
- CCreate a lag on the 2530 to connect to both CX 6200 switches.
- DCreate VSF on the CX 6200 and use stacking with the 2530.
How the community answered
(21 responses)- A86% (18)
- B10% (2)
- D5% (1)
Explanation
By forming a VSF stack with the two CX 6200 switches, they operate as a single logical switch. This allows each 2530 access switch to build one LACP LAG using two uplink ports -- one to each CX 6200 member -- while still being treated as a single aggregated connection, providing link and switch redundancy.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.