HPE6-A85 · Question #67
The customer requires two Aruba CX 6200F 48G switches to be connected to each other with a distance of 80m/252ft between wiring closets. Switches need to have reservation for VSF expansion with ring…
The correct answer is D. Ports 1/1/51 and 1/1/52 with SFP+ for LAG. For an 80m distance between wiring closets, using SFP+ transceivers is appropriate as they can support longer distances than standard copper interfaces. Ports 1/1/51 and 1/1/52 are typically reserved for uplinks on Aruba CX 6200F 48G switches and can support SFP+ transceivers…
Question
The customer requires two Aruba CX 6200F 48G switches to be connected to each other with a distance of 80m/252ft between wiring closets. Switches need to have reservation for VSF expansion with ring topology in each cabinet. What is a valid configuration for a redundant link-aggregation port configuration?
Options
- APorts 1/1/49 and 1/1/50 with SFP28 for LAG
- BPorts 1/1/47 and 1/1/48 for LAG
- CPorts 1/1/1 and 1/1/2 for LAG
- DPorts 1/1/51 and 1/1/52 with SFP+ for LAG
How the community answered
(52 responses)- A35% (18)
- B8% (4)
- C15% (8)
- D42% (22)
Explanation
For an 80m distance between wiring closets, using SFP+ transceivers is appropriate as they can support longer distances than standard copper interfaces. Ports 1/1/51 and 1/1/52 are typically reserved for uplinks on Aruba CX 6200F 48G switches and can support SFP+ transceivers, making them suitable for a redundant link-aggregation port configuration.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.