A company already has an Aruba wireless network. The network currently consists of: - oneMM-HW-1k - two 7210 MCs in the network core - two 721GMCsintheDMZ - 200 AP-515S in Building 1 and Building 5…

A company already has an Aruba wireless network. The network currently consists of:

• oneMM-HW-1k
• two 7210 MCs in the network core
• two 721GMCsintheDMZ
• 200 AP-515S in Building 1 and Building 5

100 AP-515S each In Building 2r Building 3, and Building 4 The customer now wants to assess if it needs local Mobility controllers (MC) for any buildings:

• Building 1 is the main office building for the campus. It supports the highest number of APs. It connects to the network core without an aggregation layer.
• Building 2 is further away from the Building i. and no roaming is provided between it and the other buildings its access layer connects to the network cone with a

pair of Aruba CX 6300M aggregation switches.

• Building 3 is further away from the other buildings, it connects to the network core without an aggregation layer. The Guest SSID traffic should be tunnelled to the

DMZ controllers

• Building 4 has its own local datacenter and Internet connection. The company would like it to be able to operate completely autonomously if its aggregation layer

loses connectivity with the core.

• Building 5 is further away from the other buildings, it connects to the network core without an aggregation layer.

This building has been assigned to a partner that would like to manage a dedicated SS1D using the shared AP infrastructure. In which two buildings should the network architect plan local mobility controllers (MCs)? (Select two)