HPE6-A69 · Question #30
Your customer is in midst of implementing a 2 node VSF stack. They require high speed and redundancy between the VSF members, the stack must still be operational if any one member of the stack…
The correct answer is D. Although interface 2/1/27 is administrative up, member 2 link 2 is shutdown, it needs to be F. Member 2 is already a secondary member, no change is required. See the full explanation below for the reasoning.
Question
Your customer is in midst of implementing a 2 node VSF stack. They require high speed and redundancy between the VSF members, the stack must still be operational if any one member of the stack fails. They provided you with the attached diagram showing their intended setup, it shows how the 2 DAC cables are physically connected. Although the stack is working, there seems to be a problem with VSF Link 1. Additionally, they wonder what would happen to the stack if the Master role switch was down. The customer is concerned about the state of the stack redundancy and requires your input. What would you provide your customer? (Choose two.)
Exhibits
Options
- AThey need to reconfigure interface 1/1/28,2/1/28 to be part of link 1.
- BThey need to designate member 2 as a secondary member.
- CThey need to "shut", "no shut" interface 2/1/27.
- DAlthough interface 2/1/27 is administrative up, member 2 link 2 is shutdown, it needs to be
- EThey need to add 1/1/27,1/1/28 to lag 256, then add "interface lag256" to link 1.
- FMember 2 is already a secondary member, no change is required.
How the community answered
(42 responses)- A2% (1)
- B12% (5)
- C2% (1)
- D79% (33)
- E5% (2)
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.