HPE2-W09 · Question #6

Refer to the exhibit. You want to enable devices in VRF B and VRF C to reach shared resources in VRFA. is this a valid strategy for meeting this goal? Solution: Create a separate OSPF process for…

The correct answer is B. No. Create a separate OSPF process for each VRF on Switch-1. Then redistribute each process into the other VRFs' processes is not a valid strategy for meeting this goal of enabling devices in VRF B and VRF C to reach shared resources in VRF A. This strategy would create unnecessary…

Describe and Differentiate Aruba Products and Solutions

Question

Refer to the exhibit. You want to enable devices in VRF B and VRF C to reach shared resources in VRFA. is this a valid strategy for meeting this goal? Solution: Create a separate OSPF process for each VRF on Switch-1. Then redistribute each process into the other VRFs' processes.

Exhibit

Options

AYes
BNo

How the community answered

(34 responses)

A
18% (6)
B
82% (28)

Explanation

Create a separate OSPF process for each VRF on Switch-1. Then redistribute each process into the other VRFs' processes is not a valid strategy for meeting this goal of enabling devices in VRF B and VRF C to reach shared resources in VRF A. This strategy would create unnecessary complexity and overhead on Switch-1, and it would not guarantee optimal routing between the VRFs. A better strategy would be to use inter-VRF routing or route leaking on Switch-1, which allows direct communication between different VRFs without requiring redistribution.

Topics

#VRF#OSPF redistribution#inter-VRF routing#ArubaOS-CX

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full HPE2-W09 Practice