A customer has a traditional physical server environment and would like to run an on-site proof of concept (PoC) to evaluate OneView's ability to manage their ProLiant DL380's and their c7000…

Question

Options

• ASynergy composer
• BiLO Amplifier Pack
• Ca supported hypervisor
• DSynergy Image Streamer

• B
  93% (28)
• C
  3% (1)
• D
  3% (1)

Explanation

iLO Amplifier Pack is the correct choice because it provides the integration layer needed for HPE OneView to discover and manage traditional ProLiant rack servers (like DL380s) and c7000 blade enclosures in an existing physical data center - no composable infrastructure required. It leverages iLO (Integrated Lights-Out) on each server, enabling OneView to deliver hardware monitoring, firmware management, and lifecycle operations across the environment.

Why the distractors are wrong:

• A (Synergy Composer) is the management module exclusive to HPE Synergy composable infrastructure - it has no role in traditional ProLiant or c7000 environments.
• C (Supported hypervisor) is not a customer-side prerequisite for the PoC itself; OneView can be deployed as a physical appliance and manages physical servers without the customer needing to provision a hypervisor layer.
• D (Synergy Image Streamer) is a Synergy-only component used for stateless, diskless booting via shared storage - irrelevant to traditional rack/blade servers.

Memory tip: Think of iLO Amplifier Pack as the "bridge" from the traditional iLO world into OneView management. If the question mentions traditional ProLiant servers (DL/BL series, c7000) without Synergy, and asks what OneView needs, iLO Amplifier Pack is the answer. Anything with "Synergy" in the name (Composer, Image Streamer) is only for the Synergy composable platform.

No community discussion yet for this question.