HPE0-G04 · Question #59
What are key benefits of a multi-tenant model in Morpheus? (Select two.)
The correct answer is A. Efficient resource sharing among multiple organizations B. Lower infrastructure costs through optimized resource allocation. Multi-tenancy in Morpheus is designed to let multiple organizations share a single platform instance while keeping their resources logically separated - this directly enables efficient resource sharing (A) and lower infrastructure costs (B) because organizations avoid…
Question
What are key benefits of a multi-tenant model in Morpheus? (Select two.)
Options
- AEfficient resource sharing among multiple organizations
- BLower infrastructure costs through optimized resource allocation
- CExclusive support for single-cloud environments
- DEliminates the need for tenant-based security policies
How the community answered
(40 responses)- A93% (37)
- C3% (1)
- D5% (2)
Explanation
Multi-tenancy in Morpheus is designed to let multiple organizations share a single platform instance while keeping their resources logically separated - this directly enables efficient resource sharing (A) and lower infrastructure costs (B) because organizations avoid duplicating hardware and management overhead for separate deployments.
Why the distractors are wrong:
- C is incorrect because multi-tenancy in Morpheus is cloud-agnostic and supports hybrid and multi-cloud environments, not just single-cloud.
- D is the opposite of reality - multi-tenancy requires robust tenant-based security policies (role-based access, isolation, quotas) to ensure one tenant cannot access another's resources.
Memory tip: Think of multi-tenancy like a shared office building - multiple businesses (tenants) share the same building infrastructure (reducing costs), but each has its own locked office with its own security rules. That image kills both distractors: the building can span multiple locations (not single-cloud), and you absolutely need key cards and locks (security policies).
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.