HP
HP2-K38 · Question #28
A customer is experiencing explosive growth. They need to be able to expand capacity dynamically and handle performance spikes. The customer is considering the NetApp FAS 6000 or the HP 3PAR…
The correct answer is A. WAFL degrades Flash Cache performance. D. Flash Cache does not move data via tiering. See the full explanation below for the reasoning.
Question
A customer is experiencing explosive growth. They need to be able to expand capacity dynamically and handle performance spikes. The customer is considering the NetApp FAS 6000 or the HP 3PAR StoreServ 10000. Which two statements regarding the NetApp FAS 6000 illustrate that the HP 3PAR StoreServ 10000 is the better solution to meet this customers requirements? (Select two.)
Options
- AWAFL degrades Flash Cache performance.
- BNVRAM is not mirrored and automatic takeover is disabled.
- CAdding Flash Cache cards reduces the ability to scale.
- DFlash Cache does not move data via tiering.
- EFibreBridge is required to increase scalability when using FATA drives.
How the community answered
(51 responses)- A82% (42)
- B6% (3)
- C10% (5)
- E2% (1)
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.