Why are thin clients less costly to secure, maintain, and manage compared to PCs?

Question

Options

• ABecause they cost less to buy. yet they provide the same computing power as PCs
• Bbecause they generate less heat in the working environment
• Cbecause they include powerful solid state processors and disk drives that are quieter and easier
• Dbecause the data and applications reside in the secured data center

• A
  87% (54)
• B
  8% (5)
• C
  3% (2)
• D
  2% (1)

Explanation

Important note: The answer key appears to contain an error - the correct answer to this question is D, not A. Here's why:

Option D is correct because thin clients store no data locally and run applications hosted in a centralized data center. This means security patches, software updates, and access controls only need to be applied once at the server level rather than on hundreds of individual machines - drastically reducing the cost and effort of security, maintenance, and management.

Why the distractors are wrong:

• A describes purchase price and computing power - neither of which explains why thin clients are easier to secure or manage. (This is also factually misleading; thin clients deliberately have less computing power than PCs.)
• B (heat generation) is an incidental hardware characteristic, not a factor in security or software management.
• C is factually backward - thin clients are defined by their lack of powerful processors and local storage, not the presence of them.

Memory tip: Think of "thin" as meaning thin on local resources - no local apps, no local data. Everything lives in the data center, so everything is managed and secured there. One update at the server = all clients updated instantly.

No community discussion yet for this question.