HP0-Y50 · Question #100
A customer has an existing solution, which is shown in Exhibit 1. (The solution actually includes more access layer switches than shown.) In the existing solution, each access layer switch routes…
The correct answer is C. Failover for an access layer uplink occurs in milliseconds, and router redundancy does not require VRRP. See the full explanation below for the reasoning.
Question
A customer has an existing solution, which is shown in Exhibit 1. (The solution actually includes more access layer switches than shown.) In the existing solution, each access layer switch routes traffic. A network architect is proposing the HP FlexCampus solution shown in Exhibit 2. In this proposed solution, the core Intelligent Resilient Framework (IRF) virtual switch routes traffic but the access layer switches do not. The customer links that in the existing solution if an access layer uplink fails, failover occurs in less than a second. The customer also likes that the existing solution does not require Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP). What should the architect tell the customer about the benefits of the proposed solution?
Exhibits
Options
- AAlthough the solution offers slower failover for the access layer uplinks, it is simpler and eliminates VRRP.
- BSTP eliminates the loops on the access layer uplinks and handles failover for them, which speeds convergence.
- CFailover for an access layer uplink occurs in milliseconds, and router redundancy does not require VRRP.
- DIRF handles loop elimination and link failover, which lets VRRP handle router redundancy more efficiently.
How the community answered
(51 responses)- A12% (6)
- B2% (1)
- C80% (41)
- D6% (3)
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.