HP0-J73 · Question #83
A customer needs to implement an enterprise storage solution with the lowest cost per gigabyte Which drive technology should the customer use?
The correct answer is C. SAS. In enterprise storage, SAS - specifically high-capacity nearline SAS drives - provides the lowest cost per gigabyte while meeting enterprise-grade reliability and connectivity requirements.
Question
A customer needs to implement an enterprise storage solution with the lowest cost per gigabyte Which drive technology should the customer use?
Options
- ASATA
- BATA-II
- CSAS
- DSCSI
How the community answered
(36 responses)- A3% (1)
- B6% (2)
- C89% (32)
- D3% (1)
Why each option
In enterprise storage, SAS - specifically high-capacity nearline SAS drives - provides the lowest cost per gigabyte while meeting enterprise-grade reliability and connectivity requirements.
SATA drives lack dual-port connectivity and enterprise-grade error recovery features, making them unsuitable for direct integration into most enterprise storage arrays despite low consumer pricing.
ATA-II is a legacy parallel interface standard that has been superseded by serial technologies and is no longer used in modern enterprise storage solutions.
SAS nearline (NL-SAS) drives achieve the lowest cost per gigabyte in enterprise storage by using high-capacity, 7.2K RPM platters while retaining dual-port SAS connectivity for redundancy and enterprise supportability. Enterprise arrays position NL-SAS as the high-capacity cost tier, delivering better dollar-per-gigabyte than 10K or 15K SAS drives while remaining fully compatible with enterprise storage controllers and service agreements. This distinguishes SAS from legacy and consumer-grade alternatives that lack enterprise qualification.
Parallel SCSI is an older, legacy protocol with limited drive capacity, constrained bus scalability, and higher per-unit cost, resulting in a higher cost per gigabyte than modern SAS.
Concept tested: Enterprise drive technology selection for lowest cost per gigabyte
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.