HP0-J73 · Question #304
What is the preferred tool for determining Adaptive Optimization (AO) expected performance?
The correct answer is C. HP 3PAR System Reporter. HP 3PAR System Reporter is the preferred tool for Adaptive Optimization performance assessment because it provides detailed historical tier activity, I/O distribution, and data movement statistics.
Question
What is the preferred tool for determining Adaptive Optimization (AO) expected performance?
Options
- AHP Storage Sizer
- BNinjaThin
- CHP 3PAR System Reporter
- DNinjaStars
How the community answered
(27 responses)- A4% (1)
- B4% (1)
- C93% (25)
Why each option
HP 3PAR System Reporter is the preferred tool for Adaptive Optimization performance assessment because it provides detailed historical tier activity, I/O distribution, and data movement statistics.
HP Storage Sizer is a pre-sales configuration and sizing tool used to design storage solutions, not to evaluate or predict Adaptive Optimization runtime performance.
NinjaThin is an HP tool focused on thin provisioning space-savings estimation, and it does not provide the tier migration or I/O analysis required for AO performance determination.
HP 3PAR System Reporter collects and visualizes performance data specific to Adaptive Optimization, including tier promotion and demotion activity, I/O heat maps per region, and workload distribution across SSD, SAS, and NL-SAS tiers. This data allows administrators to model expected performance gains from AO and tune region sizes and move schedules before and after deployment.
NinjaStars is not an HP 3PAR tool associated with Adaptive Optimization analysis and does not offer the tier-level performance reporting needed to evaluate AO effectiveness.
Concept tested: HP 3PAR Adaptive Optimization performance analysis using System Reporter
Source: https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c03606140
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.