HP0-J73 · Question #259
A company plans to migrate from a third-party storage system to an HP clustered storage solution that supports 8 Gb/s Fibre Channel ports. Which HP storage solution meets this requirement?
The correct answer is C. HP StoreVirtual 4000. The HP StoreVirtual 4000 is HP's dedicated clustered SAN solution and includes models with 8 Gb/s Fibre Channel host connectivity.
Question
A company plans to migrate from a third-party storage system to an HP clustered storage solution that supports 8 Gb/s Fibre Channel ports. Which HP storage solution meets this requirement?
Options
- AHP StoreOnce 6200
- BHP 3PAR StoreServ 10000
- CHP StoreVirtual 4000
- DHP 3PAR StoreServ 7000
How the community answered
(57 responses)- A4% (2)
- B7% (4)
- C77% (44)
- D12% (7)
Why each option
The HP StoreVirtual 4000 is HP's dedicated clustered SAN solution and includes models with 8 Gb/s Fibre Channel host connectivity.
HP StoreOnce 6200 is a backup and deduplication appliance, not a clustered primary storage SAN solution.
HP 3PAR StoreServ 10000 is a high-end enterprise scale-out array using a mesh-active controller architecture, which is distinct from the federated clustering model the question requires.
The HP StoreVirtual 4000 series (formerly HP LeftHand P4000) is HP's purpose-built clustered SAN solution, using Network RAID and federated multi-site clustering to present multiple nodes as a single virtual storage system. Certain models in the StoreVirtual 4000 family, such as the P4800 G2, support 8 Gb/s Fibre Channel host ports, satisfying both the clustered architecture and the FC speed requirements. This combination makes it the only option that meets both criteria simultaneously.
HP 3PAR StoreServ 7000 uses a mesh-active controller topology rather than the federated node clustering architecture associated with the StoreVirtual product line.
Concept tested: HP StoreVirtual 4000 clustered storage with FC support
Source: https://h20195.www2.hp.com/v2/getpdf.aspx/c03510541.pdf
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.