nerdexam
HP

HP0-J67 · Question #30

A customer has multiple eight-node SQL clusters that are currently connected to three HP EVA 8400 storage systems. The customer has I/O latency problems on the servers and sees high queue depths on…

The correct answer is A. HP 3PAR StoreServ 10000 with 32 host prots. To resolve I/O latency and high queue depths on aging HP EVA storage for demanding SQL clusters, an upgrade to an HP 3PAR StoreServ 10000 with a large number of host ports is recommended. This provides significantly higher performance, parallelism, and connectivity to handle…

Architecting HP Storage Solutions for Multi-site Environments

Question

A customer has multiple eight-node SQL clusters that are currently connected to three HP EVA 8400 storage systems. The customer has I/O latency problems on the servers and sees high queue depths on the EVA ports. What should you recommend to solve this problem?

Options

  • AHP 3PAR StoreServ 10000 with 32 host prots
  • BHP StoreVirtual multi-node with FC support
  • CHP StoreVirtual with iSCSI to eliminate queue depths
  • DHP EVA P6000 which has higher queue depths

How the community answered

(16 responses)
  • A
    63% (10)
  • B
    13% (2)
  • C
    19% (3)
  • D
    6% (1)

Why each option

To resolve I/O latency and high queue depths on aging HP EVA storage for demanding SQL clusters, an upgrade to an HP 3PAR StoreServ 10000 with a large number of host ports is recommended. This provides significantly higher performance, parallelism, and connectivity to handle the intense I/O workload.

AHP 3PAR StoreServ 10000 with 32 host protsCorrect

HP 3PAR StoreServ 10000 is a high-performance, enterprise-grade SAN array with a massively parallel architecture designed to handle demanding workloads like SQL clusters with low latency. Providing 32 host ports significantly increases the front-end connectivity and distributes the I/O load, directly mitigating high queue depths and improving overall I/O throughput and latency.

BHP StoreVirtual multi-node with FC support

HP StoreVirtual, while scalable and supporting FC, is generally a software-defined storage solution better suited for virtualized environments and may not provide the extreme low-latency performance required for multiple demanding SQL clusters compared to a dedicated 3PAR array.

CHP StoreVirtual with iSCSI to eliminate queue depths

Switching to iSCSI with HP StoreVirtual does not inherently eliminate queue depths or guarantee lower latency; the underlying storage architecture and its ability to process I/O are the primary factors in resolving performance bottlenecks, and FC often offers lower latency than iSCSI for demanding workloads.

DHP EVA P6000 which has higher queue depths

An HP EVA P6000, while a newer generation, still shares architectural similarities with the EVA 8400 and might face similar controller and port bottlenecks under heavy load; simply allowing "higher queue depths" does not solve the fundamental I/O processing issue and latency.

Concept tested: HP storage solutions for high-performance SQL, I/O latency

Source: https://www.hpe.com/psnow/doc/a00020164enw

Topics

#storage performance#I/O latency#HP EVA#HP 3PAR StoreServ#storage upgrade

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full HP0-J67 Practice