Your customer is a New York based law firm, operating a single office, with 300 attorneys. It offers a complete business law service across the full range of legal specialization to both US- based and international clients, with cases often spanning many jurisdictions. The law firm has implemented HP servers and storage solution at its primary and disaster recovery sites for several years. With the increased volume of cases handled by the firm, data volumes are reaching their maximum capacity. The primary site consists of HP BladeSystem with ProLiant server blades an dHP Storage 4000 EVA, approximately 5 TB of tier one data and 11 TB of tier two data. The secondary site has similar servers, but direct-attached storage. The network infrastructure consists of HP and third- party switches and routers. The existing server environment lacks the performance and scalability to support existing and new applications. Furthermore, the primary site doesn't have the space to accommodate additional load. The future decision requires automating the complete operational lifecycle of the entire infrastructure. Refer to the scenario. The law firm wants to:

Enhance thestorage capacity at itsprimary site to12 TB for tier 1 and

20 TB for Tiertwo

Implement asynchronousdata replication between those sites for

acomprehensive disasterrecovery capability

Standardizeon storage technology between its two sites

Enable a future moveto cloud computing

What is the most cost effective storage solution to achieve this?

Question

Your customer is a New York based law firm, operating a single office, with 300 attorneys. It offers a complete business law service across the full range of legal specialization to both US- based and international clients, with cases often spanning many jurisdictions. The law firm has implemented HP servers and storage solution at its primary and disaster recovery sites for several years. With the increased volume of cases handled by the firm, data volumes are reaching their maximum capacity. The primary site consists of HP BladeSystem with ProLiant server blades an dHP Storage 4000 EVA, approximately 5 TB of tier one data and 11 TB of tier two data. The secondary site has similar servers, but direct-attached storage. The network infrastructure consists of HP and third- party switches and routers. The existing server environment lacks the performance and scalability to support existing and new applications. Furthermore, the primary site doesn't have the space to accommodate additional load. The future decision requires automating the complete operational lifecycle of the entire infrastructure. Refer to the scenario. The law firm wants to:

Enhance thestorage capacity at itsprimary site to12 TB for tier 1 and

20 TB for Tiertwo

Implement asynchronousdata replication between those sites for

acomprehensive disasterrecovery capability

Standardizeon storage technology between its two sites
Enable a future moveto cloud computing

What is the most cost effective storage solution to achieve this?

Accepted Answer

D. Transfer the EVA4400 from the primary site to the secondary site to replace the direct-attach storage,

Answer

A. Replace the direct attach storage at the secondary site with an HP P4000 G2 storage solution and

Answer

B. Transfer the EVA4400 from the primary site to the secondary site to replace the Direct-Attach storage,

Answer

C. Replace the existing storage solutions at the both sites with HP Storage solutions at the both sites with

Your customer is a New York based law firm, operating a single office, with 300 attorneys. It offers a complete business law service across the full range of legal specialization to both US- based…

Question

Options

How the community answered

Community Discussion