Refer to the exhibit. Solution: Intel Servers 24-core Hyper-V Server (active/active cluster) Server: 6xProLiant BL680 G7 (Hexa Core.4P) 2.00 GHz. 144GB RAM (approx) Capacity used: 31% VMs on Server…

Refer to the exhibit. Solution:

Intel Servers 24-core Hyper-V Server (active/active cluster) Server: 6xProLiant BL680 G7 (Hexa Core.4P) 2.00 GHz. 144GB RAM (approx) Capacity used: 31% VMs on Server # 1:

1x Index Search Server (4 cores, 12GB) 1x Web Front End Server (4 cores, 8GB) 1x SQL Server (4 cores, 16GB) VMs on Server # 2:

1x Query Search Server (4 cores, 12GB) 1x Web Front End Server (4 cores, 8GB) VMs on Server # 4:

2x Web Front End Server (4 cores, 8GB) VMs on Server # 5:

1x Web Front End Server (4 cores, 8GB) 1x SQL Server (4 cores, 16GB) VMs on Server # 6:

1x Web Front End Server (4 cores, 8GB) 1x SQL Server (4 cores, 16GB) Notes Cluster sized to enclosure adequate capacity should failure occur Network Traffic:

Network load between client and virtual host server(s): 364.905KB/sec (2.919MBps) When working with the customer to determine their requirements for on-demand SharePoint solution for their cloud environments, they indicate that they have six BL680c (Hexa Core, 4P) blades with 144 GB of memory in their server pool already. They have decided not to move forward with a clustered, high- availability offering for this service, but want to support upto three instance of the non-clustered service. To use a Cloud Map based on the Output of the SharePoint tool (shown in the exhibit), which blade purchases should be suggested?