As shown in the figure, PE 1 sets up an MP-IBGP neighbor relationship with PE 2 and they communicate over MPLS LDP. A CE communicates with a PE over EBGP.Add two entries to the routing table of the VRF on PE 1:

VRF1 RD 100:1, IRT 1:1, ERT 2:2VRF2 RD 100:2, IRT 1:1, 2:2, ERT 2:2, 3:3 Add two entries to the routing table of the VRF on PE 2:

VRF1 RD 100:1, IRT 1:1, ERT 2:2 VRF2 RD 100:2, IRT 2:2, ERT 1:1 Import a valid static route 1.1.1.1/32 on CE 1. Suppose CE 2, CE 3, and CE 4 do not have route 1.1.1.1/32 in the local routing table. Which of the following routers have route 1.1.1.1/32 in the unicast routing table?

Question

As shown in the figure, PE 1 sets up an MP-IBGP neighbor relationship with PE 2 and they communicate over MPLS LDP. A CE communicates with a PE over EBGP.Add two entries to the routing table of the VRF on PE 1:

VRF1 RD 100:1, IRT 1:1, ERT 2:2VRF2 RD 100:2, IRT 1:1, 2:2, ERT 2:2, 3:3 Add two entries to the routing table of the VRF on PE 2:

VRF1 RD 100:1, IRT 1:1, ERT 2:2 VRF2 RD 100:2, IRT 2:2, ERT 1:1 Import a valid static route 1.1.1.1/32 on CE 1. Suppose CE 2, CE 3, and CE 4 do not have route 1.1.1.1/32 in the local routing table. Which of the following routers have route 1.1.1.1/32 in the unicast routing table?

Accepted Answer

B. CE 2 D. CE 4

Answer

A. PE 1

Answer

C. CE 3

As shown in the figure, PE 1 sets up an MP-IBGP neighbor relationship with PE 2 and they communicate over MPLS LDP. A CE communicates with a PE over EBGP.Add two entries to the routing table of the…

Question

Exhibit

Options

How the community answered

Community Discussion