Which of the following statements about OceanStor Pacific is incorrect?

Question

Options

• AOceanStor Pacific 9920 can accommodate 24 disks per 2U chassis
• BOceanStor Pacific9550 can accommodate 120 disks per 5U chassis
• CEach 4U chassis of OceanStor Pacific 9340 can accommodate 60 disks
• DOceanStor Pacific 9950 can accommodate 80 disks per 5U chassis

• A
  8% (3)
• B
  17% (6)
• C
  69% (25)
• D
  6% (2)

Explanation

Option C is incorrect because the OceanStor Pacific 9340 does not accommodate 60 disks per 4U chassis - the actual capacity is higher (102 disks per 4U chassis), making this statement factually wrong. The distractors (A, B, and D) are all accurate specifications: the 9920 correctly holds 24 disks in its 2U chassis, the 9550 holds 120 disks in its 5U chassis, and the 9950 holds 80 disks in its 5U chassis. The error in C is the understated disk count - 60 is plausibly "close enough" to trick test-takers who don't know the exact figure. A helpful memory tip: associate the 9340 with 102 disks by noting that 9340 is the smallest model number in the high-end lineup and packs more density than 60 would suggest - if the number seems "too round and too low" for a 4U enclosure, that's your cue to question it.

No community discussion yet for this question.