Which of the following statements about the OceanStor Pacific Series is correct?

Question

Options

• AOceanStor Pacific series is only suitable for high IOPS scenarios
• BOceanStor Pacific series is suitable for mixed load scenarios
• COceanStor Pacific series is only suitable for high-bandwidth scenarios
• DOceanStor Pacific series is only suitable for scenarios with massive amounts of small files.

• A
  15% (6)
• B
  73% (29)
• C
  5% (2)
• D
  8% (3)

Explanation

B is correct because the OceanStor Pacific series is a scale-out storage solution specifically engineered to handle diverse workload types simultaneously - including high-bandwidth streaming, high-IOPS transactional, and massive small-file scenarios - making it a versatile platform for mixed enterprise and data lake environments.

Why the distractors are wrong:

• A is wrong because limiting Pacific to high-IOPS only ignores its strong sequential throughput capabilities for big data and media workloads.
• C is wrong for the same reason in reverse - high-bandwidth alone doesn't capture its IOPS and metadata performance strengths.
• D is wrong because while Pacific handles small-file workloads well (via its strong metadata engine), it is not exclusively suited for that use case.

Memory tip: Think of "Pacific" as the ocean - oceans hold everything (large waves = high bandwidth, lots of small drops = small files, constant churning = high IOPS). A system named after an ocean should handle mixed loads, not just one type.

No community discussion yet for this question.