What facts can be used to clear customers' security concerns about SmartIDC-Grad (Information Collection) ? (Multiple Choice)

Question

Options

• ANo plug-in is installed.
• BOnly open APOs and CLI commands of the collected devices are invoked.
• CSmartIDC-Grab has been tested and certified by professional antivirus and security vulnerability
• DSuccess stories

• A
  74% (37)
• D
  26% (13)

Explanation

Options A, B, and C address security concerns with verifiable, technical facts: the tool requires no plug-in installation (eliminating a common malware or unauthorized-access vector), it only invokes open APIs and CLI commands that are standard and auditable (meaning it cannot access anything beyond what those interfaces expose), and it has undergone third-party antivirus and security vulnerability testing (providing independent, objective validation of its safety).

Option D is incorrect because success stories are anecdotal endorsements, not security facts. They may build general confidence but offer no technical evidence that the tool is safe, making them unsuitable for directly clearing security concerns.

Memory tip: Think of the three correct answers as covering three layers of trust - no hidden software (A), no hidden access methods (B), and no hidden vulnerabilities (C). Success stories (D) are sales evidence, not security evidence, which is why they are excluded.

No community discussion yet for this question.