An Internet company uses Huawei Cloud to deploy its web business. It can use the object storage service OBS to store dynamic files and the elastic file service SFS to store static files.

Question

Options

• ATrue
• BFalse

• A
  19% (3)
• B
  81% (13)

Explanation

Option B is correct because the statement has the roles of OBS and SFS reversed. OBS (Object Storage Service) is designed for storing static content - such as images, videos, HTML files, and other unstructured assets - making it ideal for web static resources. SFS (Scalable File Service) provides a shared, mountable file system suited for dynamic workloads where multiple compute instances need concurrent read/write access to shared files.

Option A is wrong because accepting the statement as true would mean using OBS for dynamic files, which contradicts its design as an object store optimized for static, immutable content accessed via HTTP. Using SFS for static files would also be unnecessarily expensive and architecturally mismatched for that use case.

Memory tip: Think "OBS = Objects = Static" - object storage holds discrete, rarely-changing objects like web assets. SFS = Shared File System = Dynamic, because a shared file system is what multiple servers need when they're actively reading and writing files together.

No community discussion yet for this question.