An Internet company uses Huawei Cloud to deploy its web services. It can use the object storage service OBS to store dynamic files, and use the elastic file service SFS to store static files.

Question

Options

• ATrue
• BFalse

• A
  84% (26)
• B
  16% (5)

Explanation

Option A is correct because both OBS and SFS are general-purpose storage services that support a wide range of file types. OBS (Object Storage Service) is well-suited for storing dynamic, application-generated files - such as user uploads or content produced at runtime - because it offers scalable, API-accessible unstructured data storage. SFS (Elastic File Service) provides a shared POSIX-compliant file system that can be mounted across multiple Elastic Cloud Server instances, making it equally capable of storing static files like configuration assets or shared resources. Option B is wrong because it incorrectly assumes these services are restricted to a single file type, when in fact neither has a hard limitation preventing it from handling both dynamic and static content.

Memory tip: OBS stores Objects via APIs (great for dynamic, programmatically generated data), while SFS acts like a Shared File System mounted to servers (great for static shared content) - but remember, "can" is the key word; either service can handle both file types in Huawei Cloud.

No community discussion yet for this question.