H13-821_V3.0 · Question #211
Which of the following descriptions about the disaster recovery solution in two places and three centers is correct? (Multiple choice)
The correct answer is A. When the entire production site fails, switch the active and standby status of the database, and C. The business can be shared between the two regions through DNS, and the disaster recovery D. When an AZ of the production site fails, the business system switches to another AZ, and the E. Deploy RDS database instances in the production and disaster recovery centers respectively, and. Disaster Recovery in Two Places and Three Centers Options A, C, D, and E represent the core principles of a robust disaster recovery architecture. Option A correctly describes database failover when a production site is completely lost-you promote the standby database to active…
Question
Which of the following descriptions about the disaster recovery solution in two places and three centers is correct? (Multiple choice)
Options
- AWhen the entire production site fails, switch the active and standby status of the database, and
- BConfigurations, logs, snapshots, and backups generated by production and disaster recovery
- CThe business can be shared between the two regions through DNS, and the disaster recovery
- DWhen an AZ of the production site fails, the business system switches to another AZ, and the
- EDeploy RDS database instances in the production and disaster recovery centers respectively, and
How the community answered
(22 responses)- A77% (17)
- B23% (5)
Explanation
Disaster Recovery in Two Places and Three Centers
Options A, C, D, and E represent the core principles of a robust disaster recovery architecture. Option A correctly describes database failover when a production site is completely lost-you promote the standby database to active status. Option C is correct because DNS failover enables traffic routing between geographic regions based on availability, allowing seamless business continuity. Option D correctly addresses intra-region failover when a single Availability Zone fails, ensuring services shift to another AZ within the same region. Option E is correct because deploying RDS instances across both production and disaster recovery sites enables data replication and failover capabilities.
Option B fails because the statement is incomplete and vague-while configurations, logs, snapshots, and backups should indeed be replicated across sites, the option doesn't clearly express this as a requirement or characteristic of the solution.
Memory tip: Remember the three failover levels in this architecture-(1) AZ-level failover within a region, (2) region-level failover via DNS, and (3) database promotion when the primary site fails. All three must be properly configured for a complete disaster recovery strategy.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.