In a homogeneous online migration scenario, which camouflage strategy should be used for a storage system whose Huawei multipath version is V1R8C50 and the multipath cannot query the source storage…

Question

Options

• AThird-party camouflage
• BNo disguise
• CBasic camouflage
• DExtended camouflage

• A
  5% (1)
• B
  14% (3)
• C
  10% (2)
• D
  71% (15)

Explanation

Extended camouflage (D) applies when two conditions favor a more comprehensive identity-spoofing strategy: the Huawei multipath version is V1R8C50 (a specific version that requires extended identity masking), and the multipath software cannot query the source storage serial number (SN). In this case, the target storage must present a fuller disguise that doesn't rely on SN matching, which is exactly what Extended camouflage provides over Basic camouflage.

Why the distractors fail:

• (A) Third-party camouflage is reserved for hosts running non-Huawei multipath software - the scenario explicitly uses Huawei multipath.
• (B) No disguise is only valid when multipath software is absent entirely or the environment doesn't require identity masking during migration.
• (C) Basic camouflage works when the Huawei multipath can query the source SN - the opposite of what this scenario describes.

Memory tip: Think of it as a sliding scale - No disguise → Basic → Extended → Third-party. Move to Extended when something breaks Basic's assumption: either the SN is invisible to multipath, or the multipath version (like V1R8C50) demands it. "Can't see the SN? Extend the disguise."

No community discussion yet for this question.