In Huawei Fusion Computer, which of the following measurement factors for computing resource scheduling is wrong?

Question

Options

• AWhen set to "Memory", the scheduling policy is triggered when the memory condition is met
• BWhen set to "CPU", the scheduling policy is triggered when the CPU condition is met
• CWhen "CPU and memory" is set, the scheduling policy is triggered only when the CPU and
• DWhen set to "CPU and Memory", the scheduling policy is triggered when the CPU or memory

• A
  3% (1)
• B
  3% (1)
• C
  81% (25)
• D
  13% (4)

Explanation

Option C is incorrect because it claims the "CPU and Memory" scheduling policy triggers only when both CPU and memory conditions are met simultaneously - but that's not how it works. In Huawei Fusion Computer, the "CPU and Memory" measurement factor uses OR logic, meaning the policy fires when either the CPU condition or the memory condition is satisfied, as correctly described in option D.

Options A and B are accurate: setting the factor to "Memory" or "CPU" respectively triggers the policy when that single condition threshold is crossed - straightforward single-metric logic. Option D is also accurate and directly contradicts C, confirming that "CPU and Memory" requires only one of the two conditions to be met.

Memory tip: Think of "CPU and Memory" as a safety net - you want it to react to any resource pressure, not wait until both are stressed at once. "And" in the name refers to the scope of metrics monitored, not a requirement for both to trigger simultaneously.

No community discussion yet for this question.