Which of the following descriptions about roaming groups in inter-WAC roaming solutions is wrong?

Question

Options

• AA maximum of 16 AC members can be added to a roaming group. The same WAC can join
• BRoaming group names must remain consistent between WACs
• CWhen configuring a roaming group, ensure that the WAC has been configured with the CAPWAP
• DWACs in the same roaming group must use the same software version, otherwise roaming

• A
  75% (27)
• B
  14% (5)
• C
  8% (3)
• D
  3% (1)

Explanation

Option A is the wrong description because the maximum number of AC members that can be added to a roaming group is 8, not 16 - stating 16 exceeds the actual platform limit and would mislead network engineers configuring inter-WAC roaming. Options B, C, and D are all accurate requirements: roaming group names must match across WACs (B) because mismatched names prevent the WACs from recognizing each other as part of the same group; CAPWAP source configuration (C) is a prerequisite since inter-WAC communication relies on the CAPWAP tunnel; and identical software versions (D) are mandatory to ensure protocol compatibility during handoffs. A helpful memory tip: remember "8 is the gate" - a roaming group holds a maximum of 8 WAC members, and if you see a number higher than that in an exam option, it's almost certainly the wrong answer.

No community discussion yet for this question.