The terminal dial test report mainly includes three parts: an overview of the evaluation results, an overview of the manufacturer's indicators, and test details. The overview of the manufacturer's…

Question

Options

• AManufacturer Index Overview In addition to providing the test results of each test item, it also
• BWhen the terminal signal strength is greater than or equal to -65dBm, the indicator evaluation
• CWhen the Ping packet delay is less than or equal to 10ms, the indicator evaluation result is
• DWhen the file download rate is greater than or equal to 25 MBps, the indicator evaluation result is

• A
  3% (1)
• B
  12% (4)
• C
  6% (2)
• D
  79% (26)

Explanation

Option D contains an incorrect threshold specification for the file download rate evaluation criterion. In terminal dial test standards, download rate thresholds are measured in Mbps (megabits per second), not MBps (megabytes per second). Since 1 MBps = 8 Mbps, stating "25 MBps" would imply a 200 Mbps threshold - a figure inconsistent with standard evaluation benchmarks used in terminal dial testing. The correct criterion uses Mbps as the unit, making D's description technically wrong.

Options A, B, and C are correct descriptions: A accurately describes the dual function of the manufacturer indicator overview (displaying results and providing analysis); B correctly states that signal strength ≥ -65dBm yields a passing evaluation (standard RF threshold for acceptable connectivity); and C correctly identifies ≤ 10ms ping delay as the benchmark for a good latency result (a widely accepted low-latency standard in network testing).

Memory tip: Watch for unit traps on exam questions - the difference between Mbps (megabits) and MBps (megabytes) is an 8x multiplier. If a download threshold "feels too high," check whether the unit has been swapped from bits to bytes.

No community discussion yet for this question.